From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-20 04:35:27
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Darren Cook" <darren_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> First and foremost I would like to remind everybody that we
>>> one library intended to cover this problem domain (completely
>>> IMO - but that's another story). This library not only do not
>>> of existent solution it's not even comparatively close feature
>> Which existing library?
> ? program options
It is true that there is a small overlap with program-options, but the
rest of the library (the majority of the library) doesn't have anything
to do with Program Options AFAICT.
Also, but that needs to be confirmed, my impression was that
for small jobs, Marcin's approach would be easier to apply, whereas
Program Options is when you really need through solution.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk