From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-20 22:29:59
On 4/20/06, Walter Landry <wlandry_at_[hidden]> wrote:
I am not suggesting getting rid of Boost.Build entirely. BuildSystem
> would be used for configuration, and Boost.Build could still be used
> for building. I use BuildSystem with SCons. Petsc uses it with make.
How would introducing yet another tool into the build process help in any
way? I think Boost.Config (header files) plays the same role BuildSystem
does in this case, with no extra tools required.
-- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk