From: Pedro Lamarão (pedro.lamarao_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-11 15:09:52
Thorsten Ottosen escreveu:
> As a concrete example, what happens when I commit the new version of the
> range library. Can I simply mark some of the compilers as not supported
> to get it into the stable-branch, or do I have to wait forever to get it
> from trunk to stable?
Your question is answered in the document:
"If and only if trunk changes for a library show no unexpected failures
on any required compiler/platform, the developer may merge those changes
into stable. If the merge causes any unexpected failures whatsoever, the
changes must be reverted immediately."
"An unexpected failure is any test that fails and is not marked up in
status/explicit-failures-markup.xml as an expected failure."
If a library don't support a compiler, then all tests can be "expected
failures", and the criteria for a marge is met.
> Also, what happens if several libraries depend on your library in trunk,
> but can't work with the dependency found in stable? But the version in
> trunk is not ready to go to stable and so this will stall all libraries
> that depend on that library?
This answer is also in the document, implied in the following paragraph:
"Problems with one library do not delay release of other libraries.
Although release of an update for a particular library may be delayed by
a dependency on another library, an upgrade for given library is never
delayed by a wait for a non-dependency library."
Yes, dependant libraries wait for dependencies to go in. This point
should be made more explicit, maybe in a separate "disadvantages" section.
This is a very _sound_ proposal.
-- Pedro Lamarão Desenvolvimento Intersix Technologies S.A. SP: (55 11 3803-9300) RJ: (55 21 3852-3240) www.intersix.com.br Your Security is our Business
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk