[boost] boost::noncopyable

From: Michael Goldshteyn (mgoldshteyn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-18 17:24:54

Is there a reason why the prototype for noncopyable's operator= is improper. 
It is:

const noncopyable& operator=( const noncopyable& );

instead of

noncopyable& operator=( const noncopyable& );

Also, shouldn't the destructor really be virtual?

Michael Goldshteyn