Re: [boost] compressed_pair initialization

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-19 08:09:21

"Matt Calabrese" <rivorus_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>
>>
>>
> Well, I was bored so I put together a simple compressed_tuple anyway as an
> example of how it could be implemented fairly elegantly and account for a
> large number of elements. Right now it's set to work with up to 10 elements,
> but that can be adjusted by modifying the #define at the top. The difference
> from compressed pair is that storage is not shared if two types are used
> that are the same empty type. A get member function template is supported,
> but not a non-member version, though one could be easily added.
>
> http://www.illegal-immigration.com/Riv/boost/compressed_tuple.hpp

Ouch!  Are you sure you wouldn't rather use file iteration for that?
http://boost-consulting.com/mplbook/preprocessor.html#file-iteration

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com