Re: [boost] [config] New identification system [was: Macro proposal]

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 13:19:36

Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:

> * the BOOST_TESTED_AT macro; it seems we forgot about this, but we
> should be able to write:
>
> #if BOOST_WORKAROUND (BOOST_CXX_MSVC, BOOST_TESTED_AT(...))
>
> or its moral equivalent. This means that either BOOST_TESTED_AT or
> BOOST_WORKAROUND can't have the current and the proposed syntax,
> respectively

   BOOST_WORKAROUND(CXX_MSVC, <=, 7,1,0)
   BOOST_WORKAROUND(CXX_MSVC, tested_at, 7,1,0)

is an implementable syntax.

It might be possible to drop the 2nd comma, but I'm not sure of that
and it might be too cute :)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com