Re: [boost] Interest in super string class?

From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-04 16:41:07

Jeff Garland wrote:

> Now lets examine the hastily created *pre-alpha* super_string docs:
> 
> template<class char_type>
> void basic_super_string< char_type >::replace_all_regex(
>                  const base_string_type &  	match_regex,
> 		const base_string_type &  	replace_format)  	

OK, now I 'get it'.  Until this example I simply saw functions moving
from one interface into another - now I see that the interface itself
becomes cleaner.

Move me from 'skeptic' to 'believer', although I still can't help
feeling dirty for endorsing this!  Some dogma just runs too deep to
easily walk away from I guess.

-- 
AlisdairM