Re: [boost] tr1/test_function_tricky trickier than needed

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-10 06:08:04

Peter Dimov wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>
>>> * Someone like me that doesn't pay the necessary attention can
>>> inadvertently "fix" something that doesn't need fixing.
>>
>> :-)
>
> Well, for what it's worth, test_bind_tricky _is_ passing for g++
> 4.1.1 now. :-) And so is test_function_tricky, for different reasons.
> However, test_boost seems to have started failing, presumably because
> I added an #include <functional> to boost/function.hpp to bring in
> unary_function and binary_function and this probably created a header
> loop. Any ideas on how we might fix that?

Try using <boost/config/no_tr1/functional.hpp> rather than <functional> (the 
former suppresses inclusion of the TR1 <functional> code even if Boost.TR1 
is in the path).

John.