Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-16 20:53:19

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Interested? Simplify usage of std::rel_ops"
Previous message: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Low-level precision timer proposal - Part II"
In reply to: Julio M. Merino Vidal: "[boost] Problems with msvc80 and bjam"

"Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Shouldn't my rule work with dynamic libraries (i.e. without the static
> linking "hack")? Am I doing something wrong? Or is this simply
> working as expected and I should stick to static linking?

I suggest you ask on the Boost.Build list.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Interested? Simplify usage of std::rel_ops"
Previous message: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Low-level precision timer proposal - Part II"
In reply to: Julio M. Merino Vidal: "[boost] Problems with msvc80 and bjam"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk