Re: [boost] Low-level precision timer proposal - Part II

From: Martin Slater (mslater_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-16 23:08:28

> frequency adjustments, such as performed via SpeedStep, are not. But
> it's just a first cut. And then, I don't think one would want to use
> these facilities with SpeedStep in the way.

I think it should at least detect SpeedStep and fail or fall back to a 
possibly lower precision but stable timer. IMO without this its unusable 
except for very basic performance tests.

my 2c

Martin

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 14/07/2006