Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification (2006-07-16/RC_1_34_0)

From: Martin Bonner (martin.bonner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-18 07:52:47

----Original Message----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Gennaro Prota Sent:
18 July 2006 12:48 To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification
(2006-07-16/RC_1_34_0) 

> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:48:20 +0100, Anthony Williams
> <anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> The inspection report has duly noted that the current thread library
>> doesn't come under the BSL. This is the main reason for the thread
>> rewrite effort currently underway. How do we mark the existing
>> files, so they won't cause so much noise in the report? Do we just
>> add 
>> 
>> // boostinspect::nolicense
>> 
>> to the top of each file?
> 
> Yes, with one colon though. It can be anywhere in the file. Since we
> haven't use that tag yet, we are still in time to change it to
> something like boostinspect:nobsl or similar, if we prefer, as
> "nolicense" could be a bit confusing to the casual reader (does it
> have a license, as stated at the top, or not? :-))

boostinspect:notbooststandardlicense ?

-- 
Martin Bonner
Martin.Bonner_at_[hidden]
Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ,
ENGLAND Tel: [phone]