Re: [boost] [mpl] Metafunction terminology - revival?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-28 08:11:35

Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:44:14 -0400, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>> So, I will use "metafunctor" and "metafunctoid" 
>>
>>Those terms don't intimidate junior colleagues?  They intimidate me!
>
> Nah, don't let them do. They are just thin wrappers around Greek
> terminology ;-)

Do "...or" and "...oid" really connote distinct meanings?  That's the
problem I have with them.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com