From: Johan Råde (rade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-02 14:19:29
Gennaro Prota wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:02:34 +0200, Johan Råde <rade_at_[hidden]>
>> The code I suggested is intended to be used when there is no C99 or
>> complete TR1 implementation available.
> Regardless of whether it is correct or not, I apologize for my tone. I
> mistook you for the guy who attacked me about the lexical_cast change,
> hence my reaction, sorry.
You are right, I really should learn more about C99 and TR1.
John Maddock and Paul Bristow have educated me a somewhat.
On the other hand, I really have other things to do with my time than to
research what the C99 standard has to say about negative zeroes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk