|
|
Boost : |
From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-17 10:45:16
Paul Bristow wrote
> That is indeed the *intention* - but entirely USER-DEFINED and with NO MATH
> MEANING.
>
> NaNs are never > < or == anyway?
But it tells you where how you got there doesnt it?
regards
Andy Little
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk