Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-18 10:01:54

Next message: Richard Hadsell: "Re: [boost] The meaning of -nan (was [serialization] facets for non-finite numbers)"
Previous message: Dan Notestein: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] Proposal for improved support for ptrs"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] [test] Request related to BOOST_PRG_MON_CONFIRM"

"Gennaro Prota" <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:2jabe29pdfmnv23fos3m20ul2ct9ncdi35_at_4ax.com...
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:19:53 -0400, "Gennadiy Rozental"
> <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Why don't you set BOOST_PRG_MON_CONFIRM to "no" from within your code in
>>case help was requested?
>
> Mainly because putenv() is not standard C++.

I believe putetv/setenv should cover all compilers/OS we care about. I don't
really see what else could be done at the moment.

Gennadiy

Next message: Richard Hadsell: "Re: [boost] The meaning of -nan (was [serialization] facets for non-finite numbers)"
Previous message: Dan Notestein: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] Proposal for improved support for ptrs"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] [test] Request related to BOOST_PRG_MON_CONFIRM"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk