Re: [boost] [preprocessor] use case: named parameters for macros

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-26 18:40:27

Aristid Breitkreuz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> for short: I hereby provide a sample implementation with (possibly) room
> for optimization and sub-optimal macro names. Consider it a proof of
> concept and further inspiration.
> 
> If there is demand, I can license it permissively.
> 

Does the Boost license work? Your work will be acknowledged, of course.

<code>

Very nice! Quite expansion-heavy, but it isn't problematic according to my benchmarks.

Thanks,

Tobias