Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-01 12:37:18

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [thread] Roadmap for RW locks ?"
Previous message: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Roadmap for RW locks ?"
In reply to: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] [thread] Question about MT API C++0X N2094"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [thread] Question about MT API C++0X N2094"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [thread] Question about MT API C++0X N2094"

Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Yes I understand, but this framework forces the mutex object to contain
> state.

I don't understand where this assertion is coming from.

Anthony

-- 
Anthony Williams
Software Developer
Just Software Solutions Ltd
http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [thread] Roadmap for RW locks ?"
Previous message: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Roadmap for RW locks ?"
In reply to: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] [thread] Question about MT API C++0X N2094"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [thread] Question about MT API C++0X N2094"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [thread] Question about MT API C++0X N2094"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk