Re: [boost] [thread] Question about MT API C++0X N2094

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-01 17:55:21

Roland Schwarz wrote:

> 1) No mention of thread local storage. Why?

One reason is that we hope that the language will provide it. Another is 
that I haven't had time to prototype my ideas for a thread_specific<X> 
template. There might be no need, depending on the evolution of the __thread 
proposal. We'll just write

__thread X x;

(possibly using another keyword.)