Re: [boost] Boost.Test feature request

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 12:34:57

"Paul A Bristow" <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:E1GiShS-0000eL-00_at_he304war.uk.vianw.net...
> |  There is already
> |  BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE and BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE_FRACTION. First
> |  based on percent
> |  tolerance. Second is based on fraction tolerance
>
> Yes, but it's a matter of making it absolutely clear to the reader that 
> the check is with tolerance as a percent - without him
> having to re-check the docs to refresh his (in my case failing) memory.

You are free to define whatever names are convenient for you. As of now I do 
not see a basis to introduce another synonym for existing tool.

Gennadiy