Re: [boost] Compile-time assert

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 21:52:59

Johan Paulsson <boost.org_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I wanted to show, as briefly as possible, the basic usage of my 
> implementation compared to something the readers of this mailing list 
> would recognize. I think it does. It was not my intention to prove one 
> implementation better than the other, or provide a very useful test, and 
> I think I never implied that. 

I do think you implied your implementation was better.  You seem to be
concerned that you have offended somehow, but I have no problem with
that implication at all.  Your arguments didn't hold up for me,
though.

> Anyway, I am sorry you found it useless.

No need to apologize.  

Cheers,

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com