Re: [boost] C++0x and Boost

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-24 07:22:12

John Maddock wrote:
>
> OK there are a couple of outstanding issues:
>
> * We need test cases for the new macros.
> * The config-tools (the configure script and the small generator
> program under libs/config/tools that updates the test driver and
> config_test.cpp+config_info.cpp) assume that the macros are named
> BOOST_NO_* or BOOST_HAS_HAS_*, without that they don't work :-(
>
> The general proceedure for new macros is documented here:
> http://www.boost.org/libs/config/config.htm#defect_guidelines
>
> So could you either use BOOST_HAS_* or else modify the configure.in
> script and the generate.cpp program to do the right thing?

Belay that: as long as the *test case names* are named boost_has*.ipp then 
everything should "just work" whatever the macro names.

So I don't really mind what you call them, BOOST_CXX0X* is fine by me then 
:-)

John.