From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-24 07:22:12
John Maddock wrote:
> OK there are a couple of outstanding issues:
> * We need test cases for the new macros.
> * The config-tools (the configure script and the small generator
> program under libs/config/tools that updates the test driver and
> config_test.cpp+config_info.cpp) assume that the macros are named
> BOOST_NO_* or BOOST_HAS_HAS_*, without that they don't work :-(
> The general proceedure for new macros is documented here:
> So could you either use BOOST_HAS_* or else modify the configure.in
> script and the generate.cpp program to do the right thing?
Belay that: as long as the *test case names* are named boost_has*.ipp then
everything should "just work" whatever the macro names.
So I don't really mind what you call them, BOOST_CXX0X* is fine by me then
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk