From: Stjepan Rajko (stipe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-04 11:53:21
> From: Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [boost] boost::signal thread safety
> I'm currently reasonably satisfied with the state of thread_safe_signals.
> My plan now is to finish an updated version of the signals documentation
> that is sufficient to describe the changes that have been made, and then
> put the code and documentation in a tarball so it is easier for people to
> try out. Time and experience should clarify any remaining problem areas.
I downloaded the library from the sandbox CVS and am looking forward
to trying it out. I feel that the "signal flow" mechanism I'm working
on makes more sense and has more potential benefits in multi-threaded
environments so I'd like to add support for your implementation of
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk