From: Kevin Heifner (heifner_k_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 11:14:02
Jeff Garland wrote:
> Bjørn Roald wrote:
>>> 2. Something is created that can generate MPC files from Jamfiles.
>> This would be useful. MPC itself does not need to be in the boost
>> distro for this scheme to work. All that is needed is that something
>> can generate the .mpc files. One natural choice would be an add-on to
>> bbv2 since it already parses the Jamfiles.
> Agree that this would be handy and would go over well with fans of boost
> build. If you took a particular library it would somehow have to get all the
> rules from the tools/build/v2/*.jam files for a given environment to produce
> the needed mpc information. The potential problem I see is that MPC embeds
> some of this same information in it's template files...so you might have to
> 'templatize the mpc templates' so the nitty gritty details of toolset
> configurations can be exposed.
OCI is going to take a look at developing a perl script that will
convert Jamfiles to MPC files.
>>> 4. (added after reading the last section of the email)
>>> Add Jamfile input file support to MPC.
>> Yes, If the semantics of the information in .mpc files and Jamfiles are
>> close, this may be feasible. Would be fun to try it out anyway. Think
>> I need better understanding of the two file formats first.
> MPC isn't a build system, so it's a bit different. None-the-less all the
> details of how to configure compile options and such need to be in the MPC and
> Jamfiles. Both MPC and Jam put this mostly behind the scenes with a good set
> of defaults. So, this also might be another valid approach.
After discussing this with Chad Elliott the main MPC developer we
don't believe that this would be appropriate.
-- Kevin Heifner heifner @ ociweb.com http://heifner.blogspot.com Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) www.ociweb.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk