From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-09 10:05:03
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Jeff Garland <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Yes, but usually UDS (and pipes that are often implemented on top of
> them) are still faster. Also sometimes you do not have a choice of the
> transport (think X-Windows over UDS) because it is dictated by some
> protocol spec.
Ok. But, I guess I see adding pipe support to asio as a completely different
project than providing support for cgi/fastcgi, etc. AFAIK TCP sockets is the
only transport for FastCGI.
> Also pipes support is useful if you want to participate in a shell pipeline.
Sure, but again it seems like a different project...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk