From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-12 12:33:55
Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>> I'm sorry that I haven't followed this discussion closely or spoken up sooner.
>> I'll just say that 'editing documentation' is *NOT* a valid SoC project --
>> unless the rules have changed since last year. Google was quite clear on this
>> -- the project needs to involve coding.
> How about beefing up our documentation tools? Make it easier to install
> configure and use, make it seamlessly generate nice PDF without the
> hassles of FOP (e.g. http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/examples.html), etc?
As long as there is coding it's fine. Scripting a 'build' and setup process
is still coding.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk