From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-14 19:45:43
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> A fix went in over a week ago. Instead of having a row of results in the test matrix showing me
> 24 hours later whether all is well now, results are (for a number of reasons) tickling in one
> at a time.
While turnaround times like ours are not desirable I can't see why they
make the whole system unreliable/unusable.
> Also, looking at the above descriptors, there are multiple entries for a number of
> toolkits, suggesting the number of failures reported is only barely correlated to the
> actual failures (and quite likely doesn't correspond the the current state of affairs) either.
This again is more a problem of what you read into the numbers than it's
a problem with the numbers not being correct. Interestingly zero does
not have this issues with interpretation.
> Thus my question: does anybody actually care about these numbers ?
Let me put it this way. I do because they are the only numbers we got.
Don't get me wrong these are all valid point with respect to usability.
They just don't prove that the system is broken.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk