From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-16 03:55:54
Jeff Garland wrote:
> Maciej Sobczak wrote:
>>Jeff Garland wrote:
>>>Well, I'll be brutally honest -- I don't think I would go that
>>>direction. We didn't pick a database project last year because a
>>>majority of the mentors agreed that the 'dsl-based' approach was more of
>>>a toy than reality. The main reason for this is that in 'real-world'
>>>applications queries are often dynamic and must be built at run-time.
>>The other reason is that in 'real-world' you might want to call stored
>>procedures instead of manually glued pieces of ad-hoc SQL queries, in
>>which case the support in the area of query composition is probably not
>>very useful anyway.
> True, but I wouldn't recommend it since it's inherently non-portable.
Portability is another reason to go away from sql queries as strings.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk