From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-21 13:53:30
"Jeremy Pack" <rostovpack_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> This could be handy. Boost.Test does integrate rather nicely with both
> Visual Studio and Xcode though (it lets you jump to the source code where
> the error occurred) - so I'd expect such a front end to do more than just
> let me jump to a spot in source code.
We may want ot add different test log/outputs to meat different IDE
> Also, if you built a Windows application, I believe most developers who
> write C++ in Windows use Visual Studio. A Visual Studio addon might be
> appropriate for them.
Yes. THat What I though it should look like.
> If I were doing this, I might try something like the following:
> Build a command line application that can:
> 1 - Run the unit tests that result from compiling a set of source files
> (equivalent to a [ run ../src/$(CPP).cpp ] in a Jamfile). I may not want
> run all of my unit tests, and just want an interface to run those from one
1.34.0 includes boost_test_runner tool. It could be used to run test modules
build as DLLs. Test case selection support is planned for next release.
> 2 - Automatically add test cases.
test suites, fixtures etc
> 3 - Run in a loop where it repeatedly compiles and runs any unit tests
> source files have changed (I could have this open in a command window as I
> code, and see failing unit tests soon after I save my faulty code).
> And then build a Visual Studio addon that makes it possible to use this
> command line application from inside VS. It would parse the information,
> display it to the user in useful ways, and allow the user to go straight
> where tests failed, or just run a single file's unit tests.
I am ont sure that command line based addon is based approach. I would
rather do separate test runner as addon.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk