From: Michael Fawcett (michael.fawcett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-28 10:41:38
On 3/27/07, Noah Roberts <roberts.noah_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Nope. Your dialog manager would keep track of the unit and set
> appropriately upon initialization and/or user interaction. Your reader
> would then be as simple as setting the value directly to the quantity.
> Alternatively you might have something like this:
> quantity<abstract> on_dialog_ok()
> quantity<abstract> dist;
I see. Would the implementation allocate a derived class based on the
unit type, or just dispatch during arithmetic based on unit type? I
suppose it works out to about the same penalty either way, virtual
function or if statement for every arithmetic. It would probably be a
lot cleaner to go the derived class route though.
> No more switch statement smell.
I agree on the smell...Thankfully it's very contained when using the
compile-time version. It seems like with a run-time component that
was interoperable with the compile-time one, you could have zero
run-time overhead during computations as well as get rid of all switch
statements at the boundaries (reading/writing from database or GUI).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk