From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 05:40:58
>[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Lewis Hyatt
>Sent: 29 March 2007 00:09
>Subject: Re: [boost] units: review
>I forgot one additional comment... for clarity, I would recommend
>eliminating the duplicate unit names (SI::meter, SI::meters,
>SI::metres, etc). For one thing, to maintain consistency, users might
>then feel obligated to do this in their own unit systems as well. I
>think it makes more sense to just pick a convention and stick with it,
>especially for the singular vs plural, which is really just a
>taste, and users will learn to deal with whichever one the library
>writers pick :-). As for the alternate spellings, I guess if that's a
>political issue they could stay, but the plurals definitely seem
>gratuitous to me.
As I recall, SI specifically says do NOT use the plurals.
So I agree with this. (But it needs documenting with chapter and verse to head off those who try to be non-standard?).
--- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk