From: Malte Clasen (news_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 12:59:31
Noah Roberts wrote:
> Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> I do not believe it meets the need of a wide enough audience, no.
I still have to evaluate this library thoroughly, but I'm pretty sure
that this kind of functionality pleases a quite large audience. Most
people I know don't use compile-time unit checks right now, but they
don't do it because they decided that it's not needed but because they
either don't know about the possibility or don't know a good
implementation. If a unit library would be included in Boost, this would
be a major step towards unit-safe code for many of them because there
would be no good reason not to write unit-safe code. People were able to
work with raw pointers, too, but smart_ptr and pointer_container are
just so much better than just "being careful" that this practice seems
I believe that the general need for this type of library is large enough
to justify inclusion into Boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk