From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 21:14:55
Noah Roberts <roberts.noah <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Exactly. One would expect it to follow conventions. Also see the
> static_rational, which I think needs its own review and be added to the
> math library.
I don't know about that. static_rational has a
special constraint that doesn't apply to mpl integral
constants: equal values must have the same type.
> I did not time it but I did compare it relative to both my own home
> brewed quantity class and to doubles.
Ok. After the interface is settled I'll see how
much I can optimize without damaging the code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk