![]() |
Boost : |
From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 21:45:51
AMDG
Matthias Schabel <boost <at> schabel-family.org> writes:
>
> > I could certainly live with that, though I'd prefer something that
> > sounds a little more ... dangerous. :)
>
> I prefer quantity_reinterpret_cast myself - more time to think while
> you're typing...
I don't think the name matters from a safety
perspective. How likely is someone to accidently
use a cast, especially if it only has a single
meaning? Also, extracting the value type is,
IMO, safer than static_cast and const_cast because
those can produce a value that is incorrect to
use at all.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk