From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-30 10:52:31
>[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Michael Fawcett
>Sent: 30 March 2007 15:36
>Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Quantitative Units library
>review begins today,March 26
>On 3/28/07, Matthias Schabel <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I tend to try to name things so they sound right if you read them;
>> even though they are used in aerial navigation, as far as I
>> understand they are still called nautical miles, so to my eye
>> nautical::miles reads right.
>This isn't a big issue to me, but it does seem inconsistent. Yes, the
>unit is called "nautical miles", but would you also propose that "US
>survey foot" be US::survey::foot?
Surely it should be US::survey::feet ;-))
which I feel is a sort of reductio ad absurdum argument
for keeping everything singular?
--- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk