Re: [boost] Boost Logging library - first draft

From: Konstantin Litvinenko (Konstantin.Litvinenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-03 02:43:58

Hello, Konstantin!
You wrote to Caleb Epstein on Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:46:48 +0300:

 KL>     I can say only about log4cpp. I don't see any problem with it
 KL> runtime configuration. I can control all aspects of logging. Yes,
 KL> sometimes function arguments and return values surprise me, but this
 KL> can be easily fixed to be more natural. Also I never do configuring by
 KL> hands - only from config files. Recently I added factories into library
 KL> to make writting different kind of configurators easy task. About
 KL> bloating. I know every peace of library and can say that there is
 KL> samething not needed.

    Ups, should read "...and can't say that there is samething not needed."

With best regards, Konstantin Litvinenko.