Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 04:47:51

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [math toolkit] Formal Review today, April 11, through April 20"
Previous message: Grégory Pakosz: "[boost] is_enum implementation, why add_reference ?"
In reply to: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] [Report] 0 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-04-13)"

Roland,

please post questions like this to the testing list.

Thomas

Roland Schwarz wrote:
>
> See e.g.
> http://tinyurl.com/2689bg
>
> To me this looks as if the report generator is still hiding some errors.

IIUC this is marked fail expected.

>
> In this case the exit code is not zero, altough the test is flagged
> succed. So I suspect there is no guarantee other regression tests that
> are failing are reported correctly.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [math toolkit] Formal Review today, April 11, through April 20"
Previous message: Grégory Pakosz: "[boost] is_enum implementation, why add_reference ?"
In reply to: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] [Report] 0 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-04-13)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk