Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 12:35:47

Next message: Sohail Somani: "[boost] implementation of moveconstructor (was [shared_ptr] dangerous implementation of moveconstructor)"
Previous message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] dangerous implementation of moveconstructor"
In reply to: Maurizio Vitale: "[boost] boost::proto grammars"

Maurizio Vitale wrote:
>
> If I add proto::terminal<number<proto::_,proto::_> > as another term to the or, then I get a match.
> So it seems like the problem is with the "partial specialization" on two_complement_c and magnitude_c.
> Is there anything I have to do to them to make tham more "patternish".

It was a bug in proto. It's fixed now. Thanks for the report.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Sohail Somani: "[boost] implementation of moveconstructor (was [shared_ptr] dangerous implementation of moveconstructor)"
Previous message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] dangerous implementation of moveconstructor"
In reply to: Maurizio Vitale: "[boost] boost::proto grammars"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk