Re: [boost] Fixed point arithmetic - any interest?

From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-18 20:59:38

Michael Marcin wrote:

> Phil Endecott wrote:
[...]
> 
> I think a Boost worthy implementation (which mine certainly isn't in its
> present form) would require at least:
> - optional overflow/underflow detection

Programmable overflow/underflow behavior, probably specified as a template
paramater.

* ignore overflow
* throw on overflow
* limit on overflow