Re: [boost] C function adaptor.

From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-20 17:27:02

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rene Rivera
> 
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
> > It's not thread safe and the only way I can
> > see to make it so is to have a fixed set
> > of functions and allocate/deallocate
> 
> Why would it need to be thread safe? Usually one puts thread safety 
> above this kind of utility layer.

Well if you need to implement a C-callback that doesn't have a void *
data argument.