Re: [boost] boost::timers finalization

From: Philippe Vaucher (philippe.vaucher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-01 06:16:36

>
> The reason is simple: clock() times CPU time. usleep() sleeps - it
> doesn't use the CPU. Thus, no "time" elapses during the sleep.

Makes sense, but on windows it works even when I Sleep() so it confused me a
bit.

This, by the way, is something you should mention in the clock_timer docs.

Oh yes it's already there in my local doc :)
Thank you.

Philippe