Re: [boost] [proto] new version, breaking changes

From: Maurizio Vitale (mav_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-13 09:58:43

Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>> For instance mpl has plus and proto has add (but unary_plus).
>> 
>> Oh my. You're right, that's awful. I'll fix these.
>
> I've changed the names of some types in proto to bring it in line with 
> conventions established in <functional> and Boost.MPL. This should 
> affect just about everybody currently using proto. In particular:
>

I've just noticed you still have {left,right}_shift vs. shift_{left,right} of boost::mpl.

Best regards,

     Maurizio