Re: [boost] [guid] - review results? - inline missing

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-31 13:27:39

Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Your answer isn't very helpful. Do you mind elaborating?
>
> Regards Hartmut
>
>> Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
>>
>>> You need to add an explicit 'inline' specifier to any
>> function defined
>>> out of class but in a header, regardless if it's a templatized
>>> function or not.
>>
>> I don't think that this is true.

Templates do not need to be declared inline, unless one wants them inlined 
(this is compiler and option dependent; some compilers honor the lack of 
inline and refrain from inlining, others do not).