|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-02 11:39:06
on Tue Jun 26 2007, "Jake Voytko" <jakevoytko-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the best practice for this? Should the use of named
> parameters be ubiquitous, or should I only use them where there are
> huge benefits? I want to make sure I stick with good practices
> before I start rewriting vast swaths of my headers.
I don't have an opinion, but I thought you should be aware of some of
the actual benefits over the other approach. Some are described in
this posting, and others are described in that thread.
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3cuekiyo6n5.fsf%40boost%2dconsulting.com%3e
Maybe that will help you to make up your mind.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk