From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-06 13:36:29
Martin Bonner wrote:
> ----Original Message----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Matias Capeletto
> Sent: 06 July 2007 13:07 To: boost-users_at_[hidden];
> boost_at_[hidden] Subject: [boost] [IBD] Help request, A Woman's
> Point of View
>> Joaquín Mª López Muñoz:
>>> Just wanted to say you guys are doing a terrific job with this IBD
>>> initiative. It's amazing how many people have joined in in such a
>>> short amount of time, folks with various interests and skills, to
>>> form a truly multidisciplinary team.
>> Joaquin's post make me realize that we are not a _truly
>> multidisciplinary_ team.
>> We are currently lacking a woman's point of view.
>> Is there any female Booster willing to help us?
> Why? I mean, what is there that is specifically different about a "woman's point of view"? I can certainly see that an /international/ point of view is useful (a native speaker to get the grammer right, a non-native speaker to remove colloquialisms for example), but I really don't see the point when it comes to men/women.
> Incidentally, why did Joaquin's post prompt the thought? Was it the use of "guys"? I was surprised when I first heard "guys" being used to refer to a mixed group of boys and girls - but that was 30 years ago, so the usage is pretty established.
I agree with you. It is patronizing, and although perhaps not
intentionally, insulting to women to say "we want a woman's point of
view" ( or we want "some generalized X's" point of view ), unless it is
something where women ( or X ) are noticeably different from men ( or
the current group ). I can hardly believe that could ever be the case
when it comes to working on the Boost documentation project.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk