Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-26 16:49:43

Howard Hinnant:

> I've been using "sizeof(condition)" as shorthand for "reducing L1
> cache misses".  Your technique of moving the checking to a static map
> (or unordered_map)<void*, void*> does indeed reduce the
> sizeof(condition), but does not reduce L1 cache misses.

map<> is the "debug" variation, there's also a "checked release" one. They 
do reduce the L1 cache misses on the only path where these misses can be 
measured, the path that does not call wait. Once you call wait, you enter a 
blocking kernel call and L1 misses cease to be of importance.