From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-10 06:46:27
Robert Ramey ha escrito:
> naked archive wouldn't have support for helpers of any kind.
> This is as it is now. particular archives - text, binary, and xml
> would include helper support implemented as a mix-in which
> would re-implement the runtime helper support like 1.33
> >Is the goal of this move to have
> >the helper API back in place without making it part
> > of the Archive concept?
> Yes ,that would be the object of this excercise.
> Note that I did things the way I did as I though the issues
> related to serialization of shared_ptr were very unique. I
> would be curious to know if anyone else had problems
> with this.
OK, now your proposal solves my particular problem, thank you
for that. I'll try to present evidence that the helper API is useful
enough to be promoted to the Archive concept. Give me some
time to try to come back to you with compelling examples of
use of this facility.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk