Re: [boost] [review] Review of Exception begins today

From: Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-10-04 06:32:05

Wouldn't it make sense to combine boost:exception and boost:system (at
least error_code and error_category stuff)?
I find the error_code concept not only useful for system errors.
Oliver
 
> on Tue Oct 02 2007, "Emil Dotchevski" 
> <emil-AT-revergestudios.com> wrote:
> 
> >> > Is "exception" the best choice of name for this library?
> >>
> >> I think the functionality of this library may be too 
> specific to be 
> >> given such a general name.  There are several other things 
> one might 
> >> want to do in a library called "exception," the only relationship 
> >> being that C++ exceptions are involved.
> >
> > Do you mean the name of the library or the name of the 
> defined class 
> > exception?
> 
> I meant the library.
> 
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> http://www.boost-consulting.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>