|
|
Boost : |
From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-04 14:05:37
>-----Original Message-----
>From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of David Abrahams
>Sent: 04 December 2007 16:10
>To: boost_at_[hidden]
>Subject: Re: [boost] Lots of warnings
>
>> But it really would be nice if *All* Boost code could have warnings
>> suppressed properly. The situation is improving, but we have some
>> way to go.
>
>I think we need to have standard boost-wide prefix and suffix headers
>for that purpose, or the code will quickly become unmaintainable.
Absolutely - sadly I'm afraid I can't help achieving this.
But I do need, and will be eternally grateful for, all the help I can to protect me from my own folly - and this means being able to
use the highest warning without getting a blizzard of warnings that only library authors can decide are unhelpful.
I'm sure I am not alone in this ;-)
Paul
--- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk