Re: [boost] [flyweight] some minor comments

From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-17 16:45:41

JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin <at> tid.es> writes:

> 
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Peter Dimov <pdimov <at> pdimov.com>
> Fecha: Domingo, Diciembre 16, 2007 8:27 pm
> Asunto: Re: [boost] [flyweight] some minor comments
> Para: boost <at> lists.boost.org
[...]
> > As I read it, a flyweight<> can ignore all of its template 
> > parameters beyond T and still conform to its spec, which is
> > probably not what's intended.
> 
> I tried to be more descriptive than prescriptive so as to
> not overspecifiy the internals of flyweight<>, but you're
> right the formal connection between flyweight<> and its
> template arguments has to be given. I'll try to improve
> this part of the reference.

I've tried to improve on that point, please see
http://tinyurl.com/345s5w and http://tinyurl.com/2s3plu .
Does it look better now to you?

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo