Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?

From: Benoit Sigoure (tsuna_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-12 07:27:55

On Jan 12, 2008, at 3:26 AM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna <at> lrde.epita.fr> writes:
>> Thanks for your code.  It grieves me that Boost.Test is the *only*
>> library for which I have to write "special cases" only because it's
>> not "well-behaved".
>
> In what sence? How do you define well behaved?

What is this whole thread about?  Boost.Test is non standard because  
it messes up your `main' and must be used differently whether you're  
linking with it as a shared library or a static archive.

-- 
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory